07 December 2018

7. Carnegie Museum

Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Website: https://carnegiemuseums.org/
The Collections: In 2010, Pittsburgh hosted the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology's annual meeting (for my money the best meeting SVP's ever had, if anyone out there on the Internet cares about my opinion on such things) and I had the opportunity to visit the Carnegie Museum's collections. Though especially well known for its dinosaurs (see below), the Carnegie has some top-notch fossil mammals as well, and unusually among the big eastern natural history museums is especially rich in fossil rodents.
The Exhibits: When dinosaur mania seized the US during the Gilded Age, industrialist Andrew Carnegie didn't want his adopted home left in the dust. Upon the discovery of the first giant sauropods from the American west, he directed his curators to "get one for Pittsburgh," no matter the cost. The result was the discovery of the quarry at what is now Dinosaur National Monument, one of the most visually impressive and scientifically important windows into the Jurassic world anywhere in the globe, and the excavation of several largely complete skeletons. These include the type specimen of Diplodocus, of which Carnegie had casts made and sent as gifts to international museums. One of these casts made it to London where, I am informed on good authority, it was the first fossil I ever saw and became the starting point of the career path on which I now find myself. Another important type specimen in the Carnegie is that of the most famous of all dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex. I had the pleasure of visiting the Carnegie's dinosaur hall both in its old form, when it was a true "museum of a museum," and in its modern format as one of the most impressive fossil displays out there, and I've included pictures of both in my video. The fossil mammal hall may draw fewer crowds, but has its share of gems as well, including a rare skeleton of the giant entelodont Daeodon. The Carnegie is unusual in thaht it also houses a very nice art museum, as well as some excellent anthropology exhibits. I particularly recommend the integrative-before-it-was-cool Hall of Arctic Life.

06 December 2018

6. American Museum of Natural History

Location: New York City, New York
Website: https://www.amnh.org/
The Collections: The American Museum of Natural History is the first museum in which I did collections work (in high school, due to the efforts of a truly outstanding biology teacher) and I've spend many hours in it since. I'm especially familiar with the floor housing carnivores and rodents. And yes, I did mean floor: the ten-story building in which the AMNH houses its mammal fossils is bigger than the entirety of most museums.
The Exhibits: Pass beneath the towering Barosaurus or the Haida canoe in the AMNH's entrance halls and you've truly entered an enchanted world. The big draws are the incomparable vertebrate fossil halls on the top floor and the many halls of wildlife dioramas that act as windows on the world for nature-starved New Yorkers, but one could spend days exploring the wonders on display throughout the museum (which, of course, make up only a tiny fraction of its collections). I am especially fond of the many anthropology halls that tend to get overlooked by locals and tourists alike and make for an excellent day of museum-going.
Gift Ideas: The museum has several excellent in-house authors and a press that has released some really stunning collections of scientific illustration. Its library is also one of the best resources natural history resources out there, with all its its scholarly publications freely available.

05 December 2018

5. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico

Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Website: http://www.geologia.unam.mx/igl/museo/index.html
The Collections: The collections in UNAM's Instituto de Geologia are the main storehouse for all Mexican fossils, making it a treasure trove of specimens from throughout Earth history. I visited during my PhD to measure horse and canid specimens from the Miocene, which are particularly abundant from the southern state of Oaxaca. The collections are housed on UNAM's main campus, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and easily the most spectacular setting for any of the research I've done, and I had the pleasure of staying in the nearby colonial neighborhood of Coyoacan, making my visit to Mexico City one of the best work trips I've ever taken.
The Exhibits: UNAM's fossil exhibits are housed in the Museo de Geologia, a long but very worthwhile trip north from the main campus. As with the Paris' natural history museum featured a few days ago, a large part of the museum's charm is its classical setting, making it a worthwhile trip even for those that aren't fossil enthusiasts. That said, the fossils are well worth a visit in and of themselves and heavily feature fossil mammals from the Pleistocene, when Mexico was a migratory crossroads between North and South America. The museum is also a must-see for anyone interested in paleoart, as it is, to my knowledge, the only place in the world to see the prehistoric landscapes of José María Velasco, for my money one of the greatest (and certainly the most underappreciated) painters of ancient life.

04 December 2018

4. University of Florida Museum of Natural History

Location: Gainesville, Florida
Website: https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/
The Collections: I visited Gainesville for 2014's North American Paleontological Convention, and while I nearly didn't make it due to snowstorms in Atlanta (my flight was rerouted through Tampa, forcing me to drive up the coast and visit the manatee sanctuary of Crystal River Springs during peak wildlife viewing season; serendipity can be pretty great sometimes) I'm glad I did. Florida's fossil record is a surprisingly rich one and the carnivore fossils I was able to measure and photograph in the collections there are still paying dividends in my ongoing work on the evolution of cat skeletons,
The Exhibits: People don't tend to think of Florida as a fossil treasure trove, but this museum will change your mind. Florida was a crossroads of continents following the growth of the Isthmus of Panama, and the wonderfully designed fossil hall at the museum showcases South American migrants such as ground sloths, armadillos, and terror birds as well as home-grown North American taxa including a mind-boggling array of carnivores. If you like fossil sharks, I cannot imagine a better place to visit. Beyond the fossils, the museum does a better job than any other I've visited of blending its natural and cultural history exhibits, including a truly eye opening display on the enigmatic Calusa civilization.

03 December 2018

3. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Location: Paris, France
Website: https://www.mnhn.fr/en
The Collections: Visiting the MNHN collections this summer was one of the highlights of my academic career. I was interested in South American sloths and European cats, but as one of the world's great natural history museums, the collections spans the globe and the history of life. Many of the specimens here were collected and described by Georges Cuvier, preeminent comparative anatomist and the developer of the concept of extinction.
The Exhibits: The Gallery of Comparative Anatomy and Paleontology is a museum of a museum, much of it still organized the way Cuvier designed it. Highlights include a rhino from Louis XIV's menagerie, the "Cetaceum" of whale skeletons, phosphatized frogs from Quercy, and an impressive diversity of Pleistocene birds and mammals (as well as a personal favorite, a rare specimen of the giant dragonfly relative Meganuera). If fossils and skeletons aren't your thing, the MNHN also administers a series of museums and a zoo (and an extinct animal carousel!) in the Jardin des Plantes, as well as the Musee de le Homme at the Trocadero, which not only is chock full of important Cro-Magnon and Neandertal fossils but has about the best view of the Eiffel Tower that you'll find anywhere in the city.
Gift Ideas: Christine Argot, the collections manager at the MNHN, recently published the gorgeously illustrated Dinosaurs: A Journey to the Lost Kingdom. I have a copy and can attest that it's absolutely beautiful!

02 December 2018

2. Queensland Museum

Location: Brisbane, Australia
Website: http://www.qm.qld.gov.au/
The Collections: I visited the museum in my Australia trip in 2014 to collect more data for my marsupial ecology project. The Queensland Museum has an impressive collection of Pleistocene fossils from sites throughout the state, including specimens from coastal caves and the Riversleigh localities of the interior. Particularly remarkable are the large numbers of small marsupials, as opposed to the megafauna that make up the bulk of other collections.
The Exhibits: The Queensland Museum has a lovely riverfront setting and displays some impressive local fossils. These include the giant marine reptile Kronosaurus, the similarly gigantic monitor lizard Megalania, dinosaur footprints from the Winton "stampede" tracksite, and a variety of Pleistocene megafauna. There are also excellent exhibits on local organisms and ecosystems as well as indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders. Brisbane will be hosting the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology's annual meeting next year, giving paleontologists from around the world a chance to appreciate one of Australia's great museums.
Gift Ideas: The Queensland Museum operates a press that should be your first stop if you're traveling to the area and want any information on regional biology, geology, and history.

01 December 2018

1. Melbourne Museum

A few years ago, back when I was blogging with at least some regularity, I posted a paleontology advent calendar featuring 24 lagerstätte with the goal of using the holiday season to help popularize fossils. I thought I'd revisit that theme this year, this time not focusing on localities but on museums in which I've carried out research. It hasn't been a great year for museums, with a low point coming in September when Brazil's national museum was destroyed in a fire. As was the case with many of us in paleontology, this loss really hit home. Both as a researcher and a tourist, visiting a museum has always felt like coming home, no matter how far afield I am. I wanted to do something to share my love of museums, to highlight the importance of collections to paleontology and other natural sciences, and to raise awareness of the many amazing museums across the globe. This is by no means a complete survey of the world's natural history museums, but I hope that the profiles I did include will inspire appreciation of both the scientific and cultural value of museums, be they in your home town or on the other side of the world.

Location: Melbourne, Australia
Website: https://museumsvictoria.com.au/melbournemuseum/
The Collections: I visited the Melbourne Museum in August of 2014 to collect data for a project comparing Australian and North American carnivores. The collections are rich in Pleistocene megafauna from Victoria, notably including the "marsupial lion" Thylacoleo and non-Tasmanian Tasmanian devils, with which I spent most of my time. The collections are also known for their Victorian marine fossils, including some important specimens documenting the evolution of whales. As a bonus, when I visited the paleontology collections were housed in the basement of the Royal Exhibition Building, a world heritage site and one of the more impressive buildings I've ever worked in.
The Exhibits: The Melbourne Museum is a modernist masterpiece set amidst Victorian-era Carlton Gardens, so it's worth a visit for the architecture alone. There's an obligatory dinosaur hall featuring casts of Chinese species, but the most interesting fossils are Australian and range from Precambrian banded iron formations representing some of the earliest evidence of photosynthesis to a mass grave of Paleozoic fish to polar dinosaurs to a trackway of the giant marsupial Diprotodon. If fossils aren't your thing, you're probably reading the wrong blog, but you should still visit the Melbourne Museums for its gorgeous biodiversity displays, its indoor forest, and its overview of human history and culture ranging from the earliest Australians to the present day.
Gift Ideas: Museums Victoria runs a publishing company that prints several titles on history, culture, and science. I can especially recommend the beautifully illustrated The Art of Science.

28 July 2016

The Paleo Travel List

Update (7/28/16) : Four years ago, I wrote this post in which I listed the paleontological sites and museums that I thought would make worthwhile trips for anyone with an interest in fossils.  Looking back at it now, I realized that I had a few additions (the University of Florida's museum and three German sites associated with the Messel lagerstätte) to make to it and that, as it might be a useful resource for people looking to plan paleo-centric travel, I should provide a permanent link to it on my main page.  I've made both changes and will try to update the list more frequently than I have been in the future.

Original Post (7/15/12): As many of you are aware, while paleontology is the main focus of this blog, I occasionally lapse into writing about places I've visited. I love to travel and I love reading travel literature, and I've noticed, as I'm sure many of you have, a recent trend in the field. If you go to the travel section of pretty much any bookstore, you'll see the usual guidebooks and travel narratives, but you'll also see books that are effectively lists of places to visit. Their titles are usually variations on the themes of "X Places to See Before you Die" and "X Places You Must Visit." I'm not altogether sure it's a healthy direction: I think travel should be about experiencing a culture or landscape different from the one you live in, not crossing items off a list (though, in fairness, "checklist travel" has a certain appeal to the more OCD aspects of my personality). Still, the popularity of these books - and the corresponding websites - is undeniable, and it got me wondering: what would a list of must-see paleontology destinations look like? My attempt at an answer can be found below.

A few places on the list were no-brainers: the big museums of the East Coast and Midwest, the grand collections of Europe, or places like Dinosaur National Monument and Petrified Forest National Park where you can see spectacular fossils in situ. I added a few other places because they do an outstanding job displaying the paleontology of a particular site (Rancho La Brea, Urweltmuseum Hauff) or region (University of Nebraska Museum, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde). A few places made it onto the list because of their especially impressive combinations of fossils and reconstructions or paleoart (the dioramas of the Denver Museum of Nature & Science or the murals of the San Diego Natural History Museum, for example), and a few more made it on due to the historical importance of the fossils there (the first described dinosaur fossil in Oxford's Natural History Museum, for example).

Obviously, this list is incomplete. It includes only places I've visited, leaving entire continents neglected. I'd be very curious to hear what else readers of this blog think would belong on it. Bear in mind that this list is intended for members of the general public, NOT for career paleontologists; we all have our own distinct ideas of which museums or sites are particularly interesting, and many of these may hold little to no appeal for someone with a more casual interest in fossils. However, I think any of the places listed below would be worth a trip for anyone with even a slight predilection for paleontology:

Map of Sites

United States


Canada

Royal Tyrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta

Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario


Germany

Humboldt Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin

Grube Messel (reviewed 12/2015)/Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt/Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Messel/Darmstadt/Frankfurt, Hesse

Paläontologische Sammlung, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg

Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg

Urweltmuseum Hauff, Holzmaden, Baden-Württemberg


United Kingdom

08 July 2016

Fossil Vertebrate of the Month: Miracinonyx

Natural Trap Cave
Photo by the author
This year being the centennial of the US National Park Service, the ecosystems and animals of Yellowstone have been on lots of peoples' minds (and itineraries).  Certainly, the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem remains the best place in the continental United States to see what remains of North America's megafauna, but a site roughly a hundred miles to the east attests to how much more diverse that fauna used to be.  On the hills above Bighorn Canyon on the Wyoming-Montana border sits Natural Trap Cave, one of the most important Pleistocene vertebrate localities in the world.  Then as now, the cave is a huge hole in the ground, and while a grate keeps anything too big from falling in anymore, during the Pleistocene it was a death trap for tens of thousands of animals.  I was fortunate enough to be able to spend some time working at the site this month, and while my contributions consisted mainly of rodent bones and teeth, the cave has yielded fossils of a wide range of animals.  Some of these - bison, wolves, wolverines, to name a few - would be familiar to Yellowstone visitors today.  Some - mammoths, horses, and camels, for example - are now extinct but are nevertheless fairly familiar.  Others are more obscure, and perhaps the weirdest of these often overlooked animals is the American cheetah Miracinonyx.  Really, I should have quotes around the word "cheetah," as the evolutionary history of Miracinonyx has long been a bone of contention.  It was first described on the basis of fossils from Pennsylvania by the great paleontologist E.D. Cope in the 1890s, who placed it in Uncia, the same genus as modern snow leopards.  Other finds from the east led 20th Century researchers to conclude that it was closely related to modern Puma, the genus that includes modern jaguarundis and cougars.  It was specimens from Natural Trap Cave described in the 1970s that first demonstrated that Miracinonyx had extremely elongated legs similar to those of cheetahs, indicating that it too hunted its prey by chasing it down.  This was something of a bombshell, as most cats are ambush predators specialized for sneaking up on prey and pouncing; modern cheetahs are the only modern big cat that is a really effective pursuit predator.  It was widely suggested that this similarity in morphology meant that North American and African cheetahs not only hunted in a comparable and unusual way, but that they were very closely related.  Consequently, during the 1980s most authors referred Miracinonyx specimens to the Acinonyx, the genus of modern cheetahs.  All this taxonomy may seem very dry and dull, but it has an important implication: that despite their geographic distance, cheetahs in North America and Africa were similar because they were close relatives descended from a recent common ancestor, an evolutionary phenomenon known as parallelism.  However, since 1990 our understanding of the evolutionary history of Miracinonyx has changed substantially.  That was the year that Blaire Van Valkenburgh and colleagues performed an analysis of the morphology of a specimen from a West Virginia cave and showed that, in fact, the animal that paleontologists had been referring to for years as a cheetah was actually a very close relative of cougars.  This finding was later backed up by an analysis of ancient felid DNA, which likewise showed a close relationship between Miracinonyx and Puma.  The North American cheetah's evolution switched from being an example of parallelism to one of convergence, in which two unrelated species evolve similar traits due to similar environmental pressures.  It has been further argued, though with considerably less direct evidence, that the evolution of pursuit predation in Miracinonyx may have had a major impact that can still be observed today.  As "cheetahs" got faster, it would likely have put pressure on their prey to evolve traits that would allow them to run faster as well, which would in turn lead to further pressure towards speed-related traits in Miracinonyx in a process known as coevolution (or, more colorfully, an evolutionary arms race).  This could explain the blazing speed of the still-extant pronghorn Antilocapra, which has been clocked at over 60 miles per hour.  This is far faster than any living mammalian predator in North America, but well below the top speed of modern cheetahs.  So if you do make it to one of the western national parks this centennial year and you're fortunate enough to see a herd of pronghorn running at full tilt, spare a thought for the bizarre cat that may have made such velocity necessary.
Miracinonyx and Antilocapra
Reconstruction by Mauricio Antón

14 June 2016

In Memoriam: Robert T. Paine

Remove a particularly important species from an ecosystem and the catastrophic consequences can ensue.  This, in painfully abbreviated form, is the summary of what must be considered the most significant study of the illustrious career of the great ecologist Robert T. Paine, who died this week.  The notion that removing a critical species - a keystone species, to use the term Bob coined - can lead to a crash in diversity may seem obvious enough today, but it was anything but in 1969.  This was the year in which Bob published his research on the effects of predation by the sea star Pisaster on the intertidal communities on the lands of the Makah Nation on the far northwest tip of the Olympic Peninsula.  One might expect that the removal of the ecosystem's top predator would cause its prey to become common across the board, but instead the removal of sea stars released mussels from their main form of population control, allowing them to take over swathes of the intertidal and driving out almost all - indeed, in some cases, all - other animal species.  Because of the importance of Pisaster in controlling diversity on the rocky shores of the Northwest, it was likened to a keystone in an arch which, if removed, will cause the entire structure to collapse.  The concept of keystone predators has since grown to become one of the most important in all of ecology, informing studies in areas as diverse as conservation biology and my own field of paleoecology.  It is also unquestionably the largest academic feather in Bob's cap (which is so covered in feathers that it resembles the head of one of the coastal birds whose calls he could so precisely identify and interpret), but I would argue that the idea of keystone species was not Bob's greatest contribution overall.  Somewhat ironically, a man best known for analyses of what happens when when an important player is removed from a community had his most profound impact by adding to the ranks of the scientific community.  By mentoring generations of students and postdocs, who themselves would go on to mentor others, he was the father of what has quite reasonably been described as a dynasty of ecologists, the impressive scope of which is best appreciated in visual form.  It was in 2003 in the capacity of a summer research assistant for two of Bob's former students, Cathy Pfister and Tim Wootton, that I met Bob, who accompanied us on several trips to Tatoosh Island, one of the world's great natural laboratories.  I doubt he would have remembered me (and, given that I was fairly new to ecology at that point and exceedingly new to serious field work, this is probably for the best), but to have been even a bit player in the saga of one of the century's great biologists has been one of the great honors of my life thus far.  Even my relatively brief interaction with him, with his students, and with his students' students, was enough to impress upon me the significance of his legacy.  Cooperating with the Makah, he established a study area on Tatoosh and on nearby areas of the mainland that has been the focus of active research since the '60s, and for anyone interested in the long-term effects of changes in climate and other ecological variables, the importance of such an extensive data set cannot be overstated.  One of my most enduring memories of Bob was a discussion we had after dinner one evening, in which he talked about his pride not only having established the research program on Tatoosh but in knowing that he had inspired others to ask similar questions to those he had been asking, meaning that this program would perpetuate itself well into the future.  Perhaps this moment of self-reflection stands out to me because of Bob's generally (though good-naturedly) cantankerous demeanor (another enduring memory I have of that summer is him knocking down swallow nests in our sleeping area before a visiting scientist arrived, since he was concerned they had "a mystical view of nature" but was under no circumstances going to sleep beneath what amounted to a guano factory), but it also stands out because it was so clearly true.  In a field that is often accused of relying heavily on models and on extrapolations beyond available data, Bob understood better than anyone the value of data gathered in the field for answering some of the most important scientific questions of our age.  This understanding is what made him a titanic figure in ecology, and his ability to impart this understanding and his enthusiasm for field-based experimental research is what truly cemented this status.  His prowess as a researcher means his death will leave a huge hole in the world of ecology, but the legion of ecologists he inspired will insure that the community of which he was a part will continue to thrive.

22 May 2016

Conference Review: Rocky Mountain GSA

The University of Idaho
Site of this year's Rocky Mountain GSA meeting
This week, the Rocky Mountain Section of the Geological Society of America descended from said mountains to the Inland Northwest, hosting their annual meeting in at the University of Idaho in Moscow.  While I hadn't submitted an abstract, the combination of proximity, a freer schedule now that classes are over for the year, a field trip to Clarkia, and a session on lagerstätten was enough to entice me down to the Palouse.  While paleontology did not feature nearly as prominently as it did at the previous GSA sectional meeting I'd attended, there were a few highlights that I wanted to share:


  • The primary allure of the conference was the field trip to the Clarkia fossil beds of north-central Idaho.  Having taken my Paleobiology class to one of these sites last semester, I had some familiarity with the Clarkia fossils, but I didn't want to pass up a chance to learn more about them from researchers who had focused on them, notably co-organizers palynologist Bridget Wade  and paleobotanist Bill Rember, both of UI, and Ralph Stearley of Calvin College, who has worked on fossil fish from around the Northwest.  The organizers, my fellow attendees, and the fossils themselves predictably did not disappoint.  My effusive praise of Clarkia deserves a post of its own, so expect one in the near future.  For now, all I'll say is that it ranks right up there with sites such as Ashfall and Messel in terms of the paleobiological story it tells, and it surpasses all other sites I know of in terms of quality of preservation.
  • Speaking of Clarkia, there was one presentation relevant to it at the conference, but it focused not on fossils but on several layers of volcanic ash present at various localities in the region.  The research, conducted by Washington State's Cassie Geraghty, found that several of the ash layers were likely produced by a volcanic field in northern Nevada that was active about 15.5 million years ago.  This is significant because it means that the Clarkia biota lived at the peak of the Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum, the last major period of global warming in Earth's history, making it not only intrinsically interesting from an ecological perspective, but providing a possible glimpse of what might happen to organisms and ecosystems as climate continues to warm going into the future.  Another poster in the same session, by Klarissa Davis, also of WSU, looked into the connection between volcanism and climate in the mid-Miocene, suggesting that the Columbia River Basalts, that still cover much of the Inland Northwest today, may have played a large role in driving climate at the time by releasing greenhouse gases during eruption.
  • The only paleontology-focused session was on lagerstätten, and featured several talks by
    The sunfish Archoplites
    Clarkia Fossil Beds
    paleontologists from around (and, in a few cases, beyond) the region.  The most interesting from my perspective was given by the University of Montana's Lindsey Mackenzie.  There has been a long-standing tradition of categorizing lagerstätten into "preservation type" groups (e.g, Burgess Shale-type preservation).  Lindsay's work recently has been on analyzing whether or not these groups actually reflect chemical, geological, and geographic reality.  The project is still in its infancy, but it should be very interesting to see how it unfolds, as it will probably have major paleoecological implications.  Other interesting talks in the session included descriptions of the invertebrate faunas of the Raven's Throat and Bear Gulch lagerstätten by Julien Kimmig and Amy Singer, respectively, and of the Miocene fossil fish of Idaho and Oregon by the aforementioned Ralph Stearley.  The most exciting bit of news from the latter talk was that Ralph and his colleagues may have identified a kokanee population of the saber-toothed salmon Oncorhynchus rastrosus; that is, they have evidence that a landlocked population of the usually enormous fish became dwarfed, which would certainly add a new twist to the saga of one of the Northwest's most bizarre extinct animals.

19 March 2016

Fossil Vertebrate(s) of the Month: Glyptodontinae

Glyptodon clavipes & other South American megafauna
Field Museum
It's an old adage that one of the joys of paleontology is that you never know what you're going to find in the field.  It could be something fantastically bizarre or gorgeous, or it could be something that changes our understanding of a group's evolution.  As paleontology itself evolves into a more analytical field, new and improved research methods lead mean that game-changing discoveries now happen in the lab at least as frequently as they do in the field.  A prime example of this is a subfamily of South American mammals known as the glyptodontines.  Were I writing this a month ago, I'd have referred to them as glyptodontids, members of their own distinct family related to, but distinct from, sloths, anteaters, and armadillos.  Glyptodonts are as far from a recently-discovered taxon as you can get, having been named in 1879 and even before that having been the subject of study by such luminaries as Darwin and Owen.  Likewise, they are anything but obscure, having long been the focus of both scientific and public attention, due in no small part to their size (the largest are often compared to VW Beetles), their massive shells composed of hexagonal plates (the size and bulkiness of which leading to relatively high rates of preservation and a very good fossil record), and their armored (and in some cases weaponized) tails.  And yet, there's still a lot we don't know about even such a seemingly well-understood group.  Until now, I've used glyptodonts as prime examples of convergence, evolving armor similar to that of armadillos despite being from a separate xenarthran lineage.  Last month, though, a study by Frederic Delsuc and colleagues showed that armadillos and glyptodonts are similar not due to convergence, but because they are very closely related.  In fact, using mitochondrial DNA recovered from a 12,000 year old specimen of the spike-tailed glyptodont Doedicurus, Delsuc et al. showed that not only do glyptodonts belong to the same order (Cingulata) as armadillos, they can actually be placed in the armadillo family Chlamyphoridae.  This family does not include armadillos of the genus Dasypus so familiar to Texans and Floridians, but it does include, among other species, the pink fairy armadillo and the giant armadillo (competitor and, sadly, early-round upset victim in March Mammal Madness).  That such a well-studied group can still surprise us as we develop new methods of study is not only a testament to the data-driven, non-dogmatic nature of science, but nicely illustrates why it's so much fun to study fossils: be it on the pampas of Argentina or in a genetics lab in Montpellier, you really never know what you're going to find.

25 December 2015

Fossils 'Neath the Tree

Of course, one of the joys of any advent calendar is the payoff at the end, so here's my gift to you: lots and lots of lagerstätten set to Tchaikovsky.  Note that I only used my photos, so not every site I highlighted is included and there's a strong emphasis on Neogene mammals.  Happy Holidays!

24 December 2015

24. Frozen Mummies of the Far North

Frozen Siberian Cave Lions Cubs
National Geographic
Location: Siberia, Russia & Alaska, USA
Age: Pleistocene

Over the last 24 days, we've seen lagerstätten preserved in many different ways, all of which have in some way helped tell the story of how climate change through the Cenozoic has affected life on land.  Today, to close out the advent calendar, we're ending with specimens that share not a particular locality but rather a particular environment of preservation, one that only exists because of the cold climate of the Pleistocene.  Original soft tissue - muscles, organs, skin, and hair - are not unheard of from the Pleistocene.  Mummies have been preserved in dry caves across the globe: moas in New Zealand, thylacines in Australia, ground sloths in Patagonia and the Mojave Desert.  Even more spectacular are those animals that have been frozen in the permafrost of the far reaches of the Northern Hemisphere.  Permafrost is the frozen soil that underlies the tundra of Siberia and Alaska and, if any organism is buried in either region's sediments before being significantly scavenged or decomposed, it can become preserved in the subsurface ice.  Melting during warmer periods or, more recently, mining brings these remains to light with surprising frequency.  Because they consist of original organic material, these permafrost mummies do not qualify as fossils by everyone's definition.  For those of us that do consider them to be a part of the fossil record, though, the Siberian and Alaskan permafrost constitute what has been referred to as "the ultimate lagerstätte." Frozen woolly rhinos have been unearthed, as have bison (see the University of Alaska's "Blue Babe" for a particularly well-known example), horses, and numerous other animals.  Very recently, a discovery of frozen Siberian cave lion cubs made major waves, but historically (and as with many sites profiled in the last week) the real stars of the show are mammoths.  In fact, a frozen woolly mammoth brought back to St. Petersburg at the end of the 18th Century was one of the first fossils of any type of organism to pique the interest of the general public.  Today, permafrost mummies are sources of hugely valuable information about life in the subarctic regions of the world during the Pleistocene (they have also, unfortunately, become lightning rods for creationists, who have frequently made the claim that the specimens show evidence for rapid freezing, allegedly falsifying gradualist explanations for the history of Earth and its life - I need hardly remark that such evidence is, in fact, nonexistent).  Organisms and ecosystems from the polar regions of the world are the first to feel the effects of climatic change, so the light that permafrost mummies can shed on how life has responded to periods of warming and cooling in the past could be invaluable for illuminating the future of modern subarctic organisms.

Visit: Permafrost is widespread (though increasingly rare) beneath the tundras of Alaska, Canada, and Russia.  However, as a subsurface feature, it's not something easily observed.  The best opportunity I know of for doing so is the Permafrost Tunnel Research Facility near Fairbanks.  As a research site, it's not generally open to the public, but the Army Corps of Engineers does lead occasional tours.
Fossils: In the continental US, your best bet is the American Museum of Natural History, home to both a frozen mammoth and a frozen squirrel, nicely demonstrating that it's not just megafauna that were frozen.  The University of Alaska Museum of the North has an especially important collection, including the aforementioned "Blue Babe."  My lack of Russian language skills makes verification of this difficult, but the two museums that have historically housed permafrost mummies in that country are St. Petersburg's Zoological Museum and Moscow's Paleontological Museum.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: Several!  Enough, in fact, that I'll simply leave it to you all to search for one that suits your interests rather than linking to any in particular.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

23 December 2015

23. Tanque Loma

Reconstruction & Skeleton of Eremotherium at the Museo Paleontologico Megaterio
University of California Museum of Paleontology
Location: Santa Elena, Ecuador
Age: Pleistocene (24,000-17,000 years ago)

While the North American megafauna consisted of animals such as mammoths and mastodons, horses and tapirs, bears and dogs, and bison and camels - all of which would have been, to varying degrees, familiar in Pleistocene Asia, Europe, or Africa - the megafauna of South America had very different roots.  Until late in the Cenozoic, it had been the most isolated of island continents, populated by birds and mammals that had evolved there and that had no close relatives anywhere else in the world (as well as, bizarrely, monkeys and rodents that apparently rafted to the continent on storm-tossed vegetation).  However, as temperatures cooled and sea levels dropped (and, even more importantly, as the volcanic Isthmus of Panama began to form late in the Miocene), a land bridge formed that would connect the Americas.  Over millions of years and in several waves, animals migrated across Central America in both directions.  The effect this had on North America is attested to by the success of now-extinct ground sloths, glyptodonts, and "terror birds," as well as by the continued prosperity of armadillos, opossums, and porcupines, all taxa with origins south of Panama.  Several South American sites document the effect that the so-called American biotic interchange on native ecosystems.  One of the most-recently described is a site that has drawn comparisons to Rancho La Brea: the asphalt beds of Tanque Loma in coastal Ecuador.  This site contains remains of North American migrants: mastodonts, horses, and deer.  Contrary to the traditional narrative that northern invaders outcompeted their austral counterparts, Tanque Loma also preserves a rich array of South American taxa, notably giant ground sloths, the most iconic of the native megafauna.  Among these, the huge Eremotherium is particularly abundant, leading to the suggestion that it may have been a gregarious animal that congregated in the area.  Unlike Rancho La Brea, though, they were not trapped there, or at least not by asphalt.  Unusually, the asphalt at Tanque Loma seems to have infiltrated the local sediments well after the fossils were deposited, helping to preserve the bone bed, but not to form it.

Visit: I'm not certain what the preservation status of this site is, but I'm fairly certain it is not open for visitation.
Fossils: The Museo Paleontologico Megaterio on the campus of the Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena was constructed specifically to house specimens from Tanque Loma.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: No, probably in large part because of how recently described the site is, but if you want more information on it you can check out Emily Lindsey's descriptive paper.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

22 December 2015

22. The Mammoth Site

The Mammoth Site
Location: South Dakota, USA
Age: Pleistocene (26,000 years ago)

The Waco Mammoth Site, profiled a couple of days ago, is a moment (or, to be precise, three moments) frozen in time.  Catastrophic events that entomb numerous animals simultaneously, as happened at Ashfall as well as at Waco, are one way to get a konzentrat lagerstätte.  Rancho La Brea illustrates the other way to generate a bone bed: have some kind of natural trap in which specimens build up over time.  This method is also nicely illustrated by a second mammoth-rich locality a few states north of Waco.  On the southern edge of the Black Hills, a sinkhole opened up roughly 26,000 years ago.  A lake formed in this sinkhole that served as a home to invertebrates and fish and as a pitfall trap to terrestrial organisms.  While these range from rodents to bears (including some of the best remains of the giant short-faced bear Arctodus ever found outside of Rancho La Brea), the majority of the animals preserved here are mammoths.  Delightfully to those of us who enjoy exposing the "everything's bigger in Texas" mantra for the lie it is, more than twice as many individuals have been uncovered from the South Dakota site, representing both Columbian and woolly mammoths.  As has been clearly established by the last couple of posts, Columbian mammoths are widespread across North America, but the presence of their cold-adapted relative in the Black Hills illustrates an important trend in Pleistocene climate.  While the "global hothouse" of the Eocene is a bit of an oversimplification (see the earlier posts on the Okanogan and Florissant), it is true that the difference in climate between the poles and the equator was smaller early in the Cenozoic than it is today.  However, the presence of a species usually associated with tundra and other cold environments - and its absence from a site less than a thousand miles to the south - demonstrates that the strong latitudinal gradients associated with temperature today were solidly in place by the Pleistocene (though with the caveat that, because it sits at a relatively high altitude, the Mammoth Site is not a perfect analog for lower-lying localities at the same latitude).  This increase in the difference in climate between more polar and more equatorial ecosystems may seem somewhat trivial, but it's long been suggested that this difference plays a major role in driving several ecological and evolutionary trends.  Not only was climate in the Pleistocene abnormally cold and variable, then, but life on land was affected by huge climatic extremes even within the confines of a single continent.  Lagerstätte such as the Mammoth Site and Rancho La Brea show how North American organisms and ecosystems responded to this new climatic regime, but things looked quite different one continent to the south.

Visit: If you live in the US, at some point in your life you'll make the requisite trip to Mt. Rushmore.  Spend as little time as possible there and head south to the sites that really should be headlining your Black Hills itinerary: Custer State Park, Wind Cave, and Hot Springs, where the Mammoth Site has been developed into an excellent on-site museum.
Fossils: Most of the mammoths from the Mammoth Site remain in situ, and anything that's been excavated has remained on-site at the museum.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: There is, published by the museum in Hot Springs, whose web site seems to be temporarily down, meaning I can't link to it.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

21 December 2015

21. Rancho La Brea

Dire Wolf Skulls
Page Museum
Location: California, USA
Age: Pleistocene-Holocene (55,000 years ago-Recent)

Many Cenozoic lagerstätten have produced more fossils (Fossil Lake, for example) and many have higher quality of preservation (such as Messel), but none is as widely known as the "tar pits" of Rancho La Brea.  Part of the reason for this fame is likely the location of the site, on Wilshire Boulevard in the middle of Los Angeles.  Part of it is due to the unusual method of preservation, in which animals were trapped and eventually buried in asphalt seeps.  The bulk of La Brea's fame, though, is due to the fossils uncovered there, which include megafaunal mainstays - mammoths, sloths, camels, and horses - as well as rarer large mammals, such as tapirs, and a wide variety of small-bodied animals.  The most spectacular fossils from La Brea are its predators, which are found in huge numbers (in the thousands, in the case of especially common species).  Coyotes (originally described as their own species, Canis orcutti, sadly no longer recognized as distinct from the living C. latrans) and dire wolves are particularly abundant, as is Smilodon, the saber-toothed cat that has such wide appeal that it was designated California's state fossil.  Other big predators that show up at Rancho La Brea include the extinct American lion Panthera atrox, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium, and the giant short-faced bear Arctodus, as well as still-living predators such as cougars, timber wolves, and black bears.  It's not just mammalian predators that are abundant at the site: a wide variety of raptors have been found here in larger numbers that anywhere else, including familiar taxa such as hawks, eagles, and condors, but also the extinct Teratornis (which besides being impressive in and of itself, has a fantastic name that translates as "Monster Bird").  Why so many predators?  It's long been hypothesized that prey animals trapped in asphalt would have served as lures for carnivorous animals, many of which would have then become trapped themselves, providing ever more carrion to be had.  Recent research (including, at the risk of indulging in self-promotion, some of my own) has supported this hypothesis, further suggesting that the abundance of large and/or social predators at La Brea implies that animals particularly adept at defending carcasses from other scavengers were frequently preserved at the site.  This is just one example of how Rancho La Brea fossils have been used to reconstruct the biology of Pleistocene organisms.  Other long-standing areas of study have been whether or not Smilodon was social (a highly unusual trait among living cats) and, more relevant to the theme I've been following all month, how climate change through the Pleistocene and Holocene have affected the La Brea biota.

Visit: The LA area is home to several of the world's great museums, and even among that distinguished milieu, the George C. Page Museum of La Brea Discoveries in Hancock Park is a standout.  Besides the museum itself, several asphalt pools, excavation sites, and megafaunal statues are on view in the park.
Fossils: Almost every major natural history museum has a few Rancho La Brea specimens.  The Page Museum is the best spot to see them in the LA area, but several specimens are on display at its parent museum, the LA County Museum, as well.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: There is!

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

20 December 2015

20. Waco Mammoth

Columbian Mammoths from the Waco Mammoth Site
Larry D. Moore, Wikimedia
Location: Texas, USA
Age: Pleistocene (68,000-53,000 years ago)

Snowmass is known for its mastodons, proboscideans - members of the same order of mammals as elephants - that were early stars of the North American fossil record.  In time, though, their status in the popular imagination as iconic megafauna would be usurped by another type of proboscidean: mammoths.  Mammoths are much closer relatives of elephants (they are, in fact, more closely related to Asian elephants than are African elephants) and while the most famous of them is Mammuthus primigenius (the woolly mammoth), the most widespread species in North America is the Columbian mammoth, Mammuthus columbi.  They are well-represented at several sites across the continent and have figured prominently in the debate over whether human activity or climate change played a larger role in the extinction of megafauna at the close of the Pleistocene.  In at least one case, though, the death of several mammoths can be clearly attributed to natural causes.  In what is now Waco, Texas, a flash flood 68,000 years ago killed and buried a herd of Columbian mammoths, making the site, like Ashfall, a snapshot of a moment in time.  Unusually, many of the individuals at the Waco Mammoth Site are juveniles, leading to the suggestion that the group killed in the flood was a nursery herd.  Other layers at the site preserve younger, less fatal floods, that preserved more mammoths and, among other things, remains of another icon of the Ice Ages: the saber-toothed cat Smilodon.  As with all mammalian predators, Smilodon tends to be much less common than its prey at most localities, and were this true everywhere, it might remain a somewhat enigmatic animal.  Fortunately, just as the Waco Mammoth Site preserves huge concentrations of herbivores, other sites have done the same for the animals that preyed upon them.

Visit: This July, President Obama designated the Waco Mammoth Site a national monument, preserving the locality - and guaranteeing its visitability - in perpetuity.
Fossils: To the best of my knowledge, all of the fossils from Waco remain on-site.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: Not that I'm aware of.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

19 December 2015

19. Snowmass

Bison latifrons skull at Snowmass
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
Location: Colorado, USA
Age: Pleistocene (140,000-55,000 years ago)

While diprotodonts and kangaroos were getting trapped in the caves of Naracoorte, an entirely different group of megafauna existed in North America.  Perhaps our best window into what this fauna looked like before the arrival of humans is provided, unusually, by a high-elevation site west of Denver.  Skiers are likely familiar with Snowmass, one of the many resort towns that dot the Colorado Rockies, but since 2010 it has become a familiar place to paleontologists as well.  While expanding a reservoir in town, a bulldozer operator uncovered the remains of a much older, natural body of water: a lake that had entombed the remains of numerous Pleistocene organisms.  The nickname of the site, Snowmastodon, is due to the large numbers of American mastodon (Mammut americanum) found there.  Also present are other mainstays of the continent's megafauna, notably the mastodonts' distant relative the Columbian mammoth (Mammuthus columbi), the ground sloth Megalonyx jeffersoni, the long-horned Bison latifrons, as well as camels, horses, and deer.  Snowmass is more than just a megafaunal bone bed, though: also recovered from the site have been small animals such as reptiles, amphibians, rodents, and fish, as well as plant and pollen fossils.  These last have been especially important in reconstructing environmental responses to climate change through time and are a nice illustration of how variable the response of ecosystems to change can be; during one cooling event, for example, Snowmass seems to have stayed relatively warm, while during another its decrease in temperature was greater than the global average.  Unusual among North American megafauna sites, the Snowmastodon fossils were deposited entirely prior to the arrival of humans to the continent, making it an ideal study site for those interested in the changes to an ecosystem brought about by climate and other natural factors.

Visit: The town of Snowmass operates an Ice Age Discovery Center focusing on the site.
Fossils: The Denver Museum of Nature & Science, an excellent museum and a long-time personal favorite, is the repository for all Snowmass material.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: Not for adults, but Kirk Johnson, one of our greatest paleontological ambassadors, has written a book about the site for kids.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.

18 December 2015

18. Naracoorte

Thylacoleo, the "marsupial lion," at Naracoorte
Wikimedia
Location: South Australia
Age: Pleistocene-Holocene (530,000 years ago - Recent)

And so we arrive in the Pleistocene, the "Ice Age" of popular imagination and the culmination of the gradual cooling of the Miocene and Pliocene.  While the planet's temperature was lower on average than it had been since well before the evolution of the dinosaurs, Earth was not covered entirely in ice and tundra.  Periods of glacial advance were followed by warmer periods, this cycle driven largely by alterations in orbital dynamics.  Many parts of the globe remained glacier-free even during colder intervals, and prominent among these areas was Australia.  While never glaciated, the continent's environments were radically changed by climatic cooling and drying, a process that we have already seen illustrated in the north at Riversleigh.  In the far south, the Pleistocene landscape was dominated by eucalyptus woodlands, an environment still familiar to modern visitors to the region.  Unlike today, these woodlands were populated by Australia's endemic megafauna, a term used to describe the large mammal (and in Australia's case, reptile and bird) faunas of each continent during the Pleistocene.  At Naracoorte in what is now South Australia, a series of caves acted as natural pitfall traps into which animals occasionally fell, a process that over several thousand years led to meters-thick megafauna bone beds (this style of preservation is a recurring theme in Pleistocene lagerstätten, another excellent example being Wyoming's Natural Trap Cave).  In fact, animals of all sizes are preserved at Naracoorte, including some personal favorites, the shrew- to rat-sized carnivorous dasyurid marsupials.  However, the stars of the show are the impressive number of organisms to which the adjective "giant" can be appended: the giant snake Wonambi, the giant lizard Megalania, the giant bird Genyornis, the giant kangaroo Procoptodon, the giant-by-any-standards Diprotodon, and so on.  As with megafauna across the globe, there are several Naracoorte animals that have no close living relatives and, in this case, defy comparisons to anything alive today, the prime examples being the bizarre (even by Australian standards) Palorchestes and Thylacoleo.  Perhaps the most widely asked question about megafauna on any continent is why so few of them are around today.  Was it a result of changes in the ever-cycling Pleistocene climate or of the spread of our own species?  Spanning as it does the whole of human occupation of Australia, Naracoorte is one place that lends itself to addressing this question, but it is in North America that the debate has reached its most intense.

Visit: Naracoorte Caves National Park south of Adelaide, part of the same World Heritage Site as Riversleigh, allows visits to some of the fossil-bearing caves.
Fossils: The official repository for Naracoorte material is the South Australian Museum in Adelaide, though I believe a fair amount of material has made its way to the Australian Museum in Sydney as well.
Is there a relevant book full of gorgeous fossil photos that I can gift to a paleontologically-minded friend?: Not that I'm aware of.

This post is part of my 2015 Paleontology Advent Calendar, a series of vignettes on lagerstätten - sites of exceptional fossil preservation - that document changes in climate and environments through the Cenozoic.  You can see the other posts here.